A commentary in Uganda’s “Daily Monitor” reminding us of the need to “invest in underutilised crops to improve crop security” Â in a region of the world acutely threatened by hunger brought our attention to a recent comparative analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos. It assesses what the campaign manifestos of Uganda’s political parties for the 2011-2016 period promise the electorate, which happen to be mostly farmers, with respect to improving Ugandan agriculture. The short answer is: not much for poor producers, almost no detail, and nothing in relation to agricultural biodiversity in general and neglected crops R&D in particular.
Lucidly written by Ronald Naruwairo and published by ACODE, a policy research and advocacy think tank based in Kampala, Uganda, the study notes that none of Uganda’s political parties, including the re-elected NRM, presented a coherent agenda and failed “to provide sufficient information as to how exactly the pledges made [in relation to strengthening agriculture] will be implemented”. For example, all parties except NRM emphasised the need to revive co-operative structures to help poor farmers with agro-processing and value-adding, a proposal deemed commendable by ACODE, but no word on how the widely acknowledged political interference and politicisation that has plagued co-operatives in the past and lead to them being dismantled, can be avoided.
According to the study, the emphasis on market-oriented research embraced by aspiring policy makers “is likely to skew public research away from those crops and animals that are very vital to ensuring food security in rural areas. Crops like yams and sorghum, for example, are not ‘marketable’ in the traditional sense, but are nevertheless critical to local livelihoods—especially during periods of food scarcity. With an almost-exclusive emphasis of demand-driven, market-oriented research, such crops will not get the attention they deserve.”
Finally, the study highlights that all the party portfolios missed several important issues, inter alia action to stem the decline of agrobiodiversity and neglect of local crops despite Uganda’s obligations under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Here we are, in the PGRFA R&D community: wrecking our brains about how we can distill our work and insights into policy advice, churning out papers and requesting funding for ever more research justified by the prospect of better policies. But nobody seems to listen out there….